3 pagesSubject: Business
Topic: credibility of a source of information
Paper details:Learning Objectives
Describe techniques used in decision-making.
Examine decision-making models.
Apply decision-making techniques.
Prompt
What criteria do you recommend to determine the credibility of a source of information?
Instructions
Develop a list of no less than 10 elements you would use to determine the credibility of facts, articles, websites, news, etc.
Thoroughly explain your reason for each element and why it is important
Your response can take the form of a table in Word or MS Excel.
Include at least 3 credible references to support your recommendations
Grading Rubric
A rubric is provided here for your convenience that details how this assignment will be graded. Please review it carefully prior to submitting your work.Running head: Credibility of a source of information
Credibility of a source of information
Student Name:
1
Running head: Credibility of a source of information
2
What criteria do you recommended to determine the credibility of a source of information?
Develop a list no less the 10 elements you would use to determine the credibility of facts,
articles, websites, news, etc.
To create authenticity in any arrangement made about the data or information utilization
on the subject or topics must have credibility. In order to determine the credibility of a source of
data or information we need to search for records or any data of writing, visual graphics data
such as video and photos keeping in mind the end goal to strengthen on subject or topics. There
are numerous approaches to accomplish this task, case in point a few illustrations of a
trustworthy source possibly be types of magazines, books, diaries, and online sources. Also there
is numerous elements to determine credibility, below ten elements will show whether the
information or data used can be seen as valid or not.
1. Source: The sources that discover information can add a great deal of credibility. Any
publications, for example, peers reviewed, academic materials, and scholarly journals are
viewed as dependable on the grounds that numerous other researchers have
independently reviewed and validated it. Information or data that has been distributed
even by popular publication organizations has likewise been screened completely prior to
published. Information or data that can found in Internet such as, in Wikipedia or also
known as free encyclopedia, mostly has little validity on the grounds that no one is
checking and verifying the data and also anybody can include or erase data from these
sources. In my experiences throughout college class, instructor has always directed to
avoid using information or data found on Wikipedia.
Running head: Credibility of a source of information
3
2. In-Depth: The in-depth data are generally most prone to have credibility. There is on
such thing-overloaded information, more the detail more the breakdown on clarity will be
lighted. In the event that author has taken the opportunity to thoroughly investigate the
sources so that more than only a shell level evaluation of a subject, then their data will be
viewed as more solid than an insufficiently scrutinized paper or assessment that need
confirmation.
3. Content: Whenever the content of information is introduced to be viewed as credible
source then it requires references to the credible sources that can support the cases.
Likewise, the data ought to be unique, not only a connection to another link or data that is
accessible in different location. The references for the proposed source for the most part
guarantee the expert conclusion has a mainstream impact of the source.
4. Format: When collecting data it is best to maintain a strategic distance from the sources
that is for profitable and are more in promoting and publicizing than quality of data.
Numerous times these sources are simply accumulations of fabricated data intended to
attract individuals to the ads on the site. Likewise, in print format academic journals and
university or college work distributions are more credible and solid than the data in
common magazines.
5. Accurate: We should never underestimate the accuracy of data or information, regardless
of who and what are the sources. Sources must be checked continuously, check all the
references and sources, if possible we should check against numerous different
publications with comparable data. Unless the topic is very questionable or the sources
Running head: Credibility of a source of information
4
are experimental, most credible sources ought to concur with at any rate the fundamental
actualities of the current issue. For example in 2014 well-known Rolling stone Magazine
published the story “ A Rape on Campus” against the Kappa Psi fraternity house of
University of Virginia without doing due diligent cross checking the fact and source
before publicizing (Wemple, 2014).
6. Authority: Regardless of all and any types of sources all the data or information needs to
be considered. Data collected from a College or University publication would be viewed
as more tenable than the data originating from sources with less experience in a
concerned area. Additionally we must consider where they are receiving their data. Do
they have sources to bolster their unique data and where did they get it. We need to
consider why they are giving the data (n.d.). On the off chance that the data originates
from a specific vested party could be biased and would not be viewed as credible.
7. Timeline: Question must be raised like, is the data current? Current updated data is
always going to be upbeat and viewed as more credible than historical data. In areas
when the data was delivered can be vital. Journals from 19th century won’t have the latest
data on a subject. The chances that somebody composes an article today that depends
upon references from the 18th century might not have much credibility. We must ensure
that all sources utilized have been overhauled as of late to get the most updated current
version of data.
8. Scope: The more detail that is incorporated into a source, the better in credibility. In the
event that a bit of data is excessively expansive in degree might imply that the subject
Running head: Credibility of a source of information
5
was not investigated in enough profundity to be believable. More data is constantly better
when attempting to build up credibility of data (n.d.).
9. Recommendations: Recommendations may not be the always best sources, asking a
scholars, doctor or teacher to prescribe sources as valid and solid can discover great
sources of data and add to the credibility of the argument (n.d.). Despite the fact that
credible sources can come into the any type of numerous peers-reviewed are seen inside
.org, .edu and .gov.
10. Consistency: Credible data needs to be and are always consistent. In the event that a
source appears to hold those that concur with his conclusion to one standard, while
making an alternate standard for those that deviate, that is likely an indication of bias and
a source that is not credible.
In conclusion ensuring that a source is credible imperative in support of topic. The given data
must be current and accepted through experts in order to appropriately support a topic. The
clarity of genuine data would diminish drastically without the affirmation of credible sources.
Fixed credible sources like educational, government, and non-profit permits the readers to hold
data that has been given. Website like Wikipedia or Encyclopedia provides a common thought of
what one is searching for, however because of website tendency that others also can add or
remove data freely invalidates is credibility of it data.
Running head: Credibility of a source of information
Reference
Determining the Credibility of Sources. (n.d.). Retrieved January 9, 2016, from
http://www.abacon.com/twt/cred.html
Criteria to Evaluate the Credibility of NON Web-based Sources. (n.d.). Retrieved January 9,
2016, from http://mason.gmu.edu/~montecin/eval-sources.htm
Wemple, E. (2014, December 11). The full demise of Rolling Stone’s rape story. Retrieved
January 9, 2016, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erikwemple/wp/2014/12/11/the-full-demise-of-rolling-stones-rape-story/
Boss, J. (2012). Think: Critical thinking and logic skills for everyday life (2nd ed.). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
6
Purchase answer to see full
attachment